Photo credit: Rawpixel.com/Shutterstock.comIn Pennsylvania, there has been much recent litigation involving the validity and enforceability of household, family car and regular use exclusions in automobile policies. Often, insurers attempt to rationalize the legitimacy of these exclusions in uninsured and underinsured motorist claims by arguing that the exclusion has a direct correlation to premium payments. Simply stated, this is not true. Unfortunately, courts unwittingly adopt these arguments, further perpetuating the premium payment myth.
Want to continue reading?
Become a Free ALM Digital Reader.
Benefits of a Digital Membership:
- Free access to 3 articles* every 30 days
- Access to the entire ALM network of websites
- Unlimited access to the ALM suite of newsletters
- Build custom alerts on any search topic of your choosing
- Search by a wide range of topics
*May exclude premium content
Already have an account? Sign In Now
"auto" - Google News
July 30, 2020 at 10:54PM
https://ift.tt/3jVjTXm
The Premium Payment Myth in Auto Exclusion Cases | The Legal Intelligencer - Law.com
"auto" - Google News
https://ift.tt/2Xb9Q5a
https://ift.tt/2SvsFPt
Bagikan Berita Ini
0 Response to "The Premium Payment Myth in Auto Exclusion Cases | The Legal Intelligencer - Law.com"
Post a Comment